Collaborative Representations: Supporting Face-to-Face and Online Knowledge-Building Discourse
نویسنده
چکیده
The present widespread interest in the use of electronic media for learning presents an unprecedented opportunity for leveraging the computational medium’s strengths for learning. However, existing software tools provide only primitive support for online knowledge-building discourse. Further work is needed in supporting coordinated use of disciplinary representations, discourse representations, and knowledge representations. This paper introduces the concept of representational guidance for discourse along with results of an initial study of this phenomenon in face to face situations. The paper then considers the requirements for supporting asynchronous online knowledge-building discourse, finding existing computer mediated communication tools to be particularly deficient in supporting artifact-centered discourse. A solution is proposed that coordinates discourse representations with disciplinary and knowledge representations.
منابع مشابه
Comparing the roles of representations in face-to-face and online computer supported collaborative learning
We report an empirical study comparing the role of discourse and knowledge representations (graphical evidence mapping) in face to face versus distance collaborative learning. Our prior work comparing alternate knowledge representations in face-to-face collaborative learning situations has shown that differences between representational notations can translate into differences in the focus of l...
متن کاملComparing the Roles of Representations in Face to Face and Online Collaborations
The paper reports an empirical study comparing the role of discourse and knowledge representations in face to face versus distance collaborative learning. Findings indicate that the role of knowledge representations shifts from being used to summarize verbal reasoning to a place to propose ideas before they are discussed. Implications for the design of multirepresentational online learning syst...
متن کاملComparing the Roles of Representations in Fact to Face and Online Collaborations
This paper reports an empirical study comparing the roles of representations in supporting face to face versus distance collaborative learning. Findings indicate that while face to face collaborators primarily use knowledge representations to summarize verbal reasoning, distributed collaborators also use knowledge representations to propose ideas before they are discussed, particularly ideas su...
متن کاملAn Exploratory Comparison of the Roles of Representations in Face to Face and Online Collaborative Learning
The paper reports an empirical study comparing the role of discourse and knowledge representations in face to face versus distance collaborative learning. The study reported in this paper compares Proximal (face to face) with Distal (synchronous collaboration via networked software) conditions. Two competing hypotheses were evaluated: (1) The influence of representations in the Distal condition...
متن کاملThe Effectiveness of Three Methods of Teaching Medline to Medical Students: Online, Face to Face and Combined Educational Methods
Introduction: In order to enhance e-learning, the first online educational course for teaching Medline, was established in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of online, face to face and combined educational methods presented for medical students. Methods: In an experimental study, Medline was taught to 40 medical students by three meth...
متن کامل